Over the last couple of months we have been asking you to write in and tell us where we have large holes in our coverage for particular series. In the first month we covered the Campaign series and you gave us loads of brilliant suggestions. This was followed by a month of suggestions for the Elite series and a month of suggestions for the New Vanguard series. This month we are turning our eyes to the big one. Our longest running series - Men-at-Arms.
As ever we would like you to suggest 5 titles which you think would fill glaring gaps in our coverage of history in the Men-at-Arms series. Rank these suggestions from 1-5 (with 1 being your favourite) and post them in the comments section below.
We will then have a look at the suggestions, select the 5 most popular suggestions and put them up for the public vote in our book vote.
But, for this to work - we need you to support the titles that you would like to see. It doesn't matter if someone has already suggested the 5 titles you were going to suggest. Post them up anyway and support the suggestions made by others, rather than getting increasingly obscure with your suggestions.
And don't worry if your favourite suggestion doesn't actually win the final book vote - we won't cast aside those ideas immediately, rather it will provide an idea of how urgently we need to fill those gaps.
So start commenting now with your Men-At-Arms series suggestions - and keep an eye out for the Warrior suggestion blog next month!
PS. Have a look at the Elite book vote on our homepage - generated from your brilliant suggestions a couple of months ago.
You must be logged in to comment on this post. Click here to log in.
Submit your comment